PREVIEW Starts 12:15 PM ET · Nationals Park
August 9, 2026 · NL East

Cincinnati Reds at Washington Nationals

August 9, 202612:15 PM ETNationals Park
AWAY
Cincinnati Reds
56-58
@
HOME
Washington Nationals
56-61

Probable starters

AWAY · CIN
HOME
TBD

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Hitter season stats

Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.

AWAY · CIN Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Sal Stewart 1B · R .257 .336 .484 .820 25 87 109 .753
2 Elly De La Cruz SS · S .276 .356 .501 .857 19 53 115 .761
3 JJ Bleday LF · L .230 .344 .470 .814 20 47 77 .725
4 Eugenio Suárez DH · R .202 .281 .387 .668 14 40 123 .728
5 Matt McLain 2B · R .190 .289 .331 .620 9 27 91 .729
6 Tyler Stephenson C · R .252 .337 .420 .757 10 33 79 .726
7 TJ Friedl CF · L .165 .251 .248 .499 3 11 54 .728
8 Noelvi Marte RF · R .197 .239 .341 .580 6 15 45 .737
9 Dane Myers CF · R .263 .362 .363 .725 3 17 54 .708
HOME · WSH Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Daylen Lile LF · L .242 .294 .411 .705 14 56 89 .759
2 CJ Abrams SS · L .287 .362 .551 .913 28 88 110 .743
3 Nasim Nuñez 2B · S .233 .317 .272 .589 1 33 79 .735
4 Jacob Young CF · R .242 .310 .397 .707 9 39 60 .707
5 Keibert Ruiz C · S .270 .307 .439 .746 7 38 31 .706
6 Dylan Crews RF · R .221 .300 .371 .671 9 25 62 .731
7 Jorbit Vivas 3B · L .236 .324 .327 .651 3 18 34 .733
8 José Tena DH · L .235 .304 .382 .686 5 20 66 .731
9 Brady House 3B · R .228 .282 .401 .683 8 27 62 .733

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

CIN starter vs Nationals lineup

Brady Singer (RHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .299
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JY Jacob Young RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JT José Tena LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Tena
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BH Brady House RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (44% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Brady Singer vs Nationals: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · CIN
Terry Francona
Lineup 2.3 R Bunts 2.0 R IBBs 3.4 R
HOME · WSH
Blake Butera
Lineup 3.3 R Bunts 2.5 R IBBs 1.9 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · CIN
  • Available 6
  • Limited 2
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 1
HOME · WSH
  • Available 6
  • Limited 2
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 0

Recent form

AWAY · CIN
7-3 W4 +6 run diff
WWWWLWWLLW
HOME · WSH
2-8 L1 -19 run diff
LWLLLLLLLW

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Reds and Nationals staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.