New York Mets at Texas Rangers
Probable starters
Lineups
Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.
Hitter season stats
Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Bo Bichette 3B · R | .263 | .312 | .392 | .704 | 17 | 76 | 123 | .742 |
| 2 Carson Benge RF · L | .275 | .339 | .419 | .758 | 19 | 61 | 136 | .746 |
| 3 Marcus Semien 2B · R | .219 | .285 | .341 | .626 | 14 | 48 | 100 | .707 |
| 4 A.J. Ewing CF · L | .257 | .325 | .379 | .704 | 10 | 40 | 119 | .750 |
| 5 Brett Baty 3B · L | .235 | .309 | .365 | .674 | 10 | 52 | 122 | .725 |
| 6 Francisco Lindor SS · S | .224 | .309 | .426 | .735 | 20 | 48 | 90 | .749 |
| 7 Juan Soto LF · L | .273 | .389 | .520 | .909 | 26 | 65 | 64 | .807 |
| 8 Francisco Alvarez C · R | .232 | .312 | .399 | .711 | 16 | 40 | 124 | .746 |
| 9 Mark Vientos 1B · R | .218 | .267 | .406 | .673 | 13 | 39 | 67 | .738 |
| BATTER | 2026 SEASON | PROJ OPS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | HR | RBI | K | ||
| 1 Brandon Nimmo RF · L | .260 | .325 | .407 | .732 | 14 | 61 | 142 | .727 |
| 2 Jake Burger 1B · R | .233 | .307 | .428 | .735 | 27 | 88 | 160 | .727 |
| 3 Ezequiel Duran SS · R | .264 | .325 | .431 | .756 | 17 | 83 | 135 | .715 |
| 4 Wyatt Langford LF · R | .244 | .342 | .437 | .779 | 17 | 42 | 98 | .752 |
| 5 Josh Jung 3B · R | .295 | .360 | .450 | .810 | 11 | 39 | 78 | .724 |
| 6 Evan Carter CF · L | .195 | .289 | .316 | .605 | 9 | 38 | 112 | .743 |
| 7 Joc Pederson DH · L | .235 | .329 | .487 | .816 | 26 | 53 | 102 | .720 |
| 8 Corey Seager SS · L | .231 | .321 | .426 | .747 | 18 | 47 | 94 | .763 |
| 9 Nicky Lopez 2B · L | .269 | .317 | .308 | .625 | 1 | 24 | 42 | .698 |
Pitcher vs. lineup projection
Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.
-
1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .328
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 657 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 JB Jake Burger RHB .330
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .298
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .328
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
7 JP Joc Pederson LHB .345
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 CS Corey Seager LHB .343
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .279
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
- Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sinker (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Manager comparison
Bullpen availability
- Available 6
- Limited 3
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 0
- Available 7
- Limited 1
- Rest required 0
- Inactive 1
Recent form
Pitching & bullpen preview
Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Mets and Rangers staffs going in.
Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.
Keep reading
How RunsLeft analyzes games
Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.