PREVIEW Starts 8:05 PM ET · Globe Life Field
September 22, 2026 · AL West

New York Mets at Texas Rangers

September 22, 20268:05 PM ETGlobe Life Field
AWAY
New York Mets
71-85
@
HOME
Texas Rangers
78-78

Probable starters

AWAY · NYM
HOME
TBD

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Hitter season stats

Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.

AWAY · NYM Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Bo Bichette 3B · R .263 .312 .392 .704 17 76 123 .742
2 Carson Benge RF · L .275 .339 .419 .758 19 61 136 .746
3 Marcus Semien 2B · R .219 .285 .341 .626 14 48 100 .707
4 A.J. Ewing CF · L .257 .325 .379 .704 10 40 119 .750
5 Brett Baty 3B · L .235 .309 .365 .674 10 52 122 .725
6 Francisco Lindor SS · S .224 .309 .426 .735 20 48 90 .749
7 Juan Soto LF · L .273 .389 .520 .909 26 65 64 .807
8 Francisco Alvarez C · R .232 .312 .399 .711 16 40 124 .746
9 Mark Vientos 1B · R .218 .267 .406 .673 13 39 67 .738
HOME · TEX Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Brandon Nimmo RF · L .260 .325 .407 .732 14 61 142 .727
2 Jake Burger 1B · R .233 .307 .428 .735 27 88 160 .727
3 Ezequiel Duran SS · R .264 .325 .431 .756 17 83 135 .715
4 Wyatt Langford LF · R .244 .342 .437 .779 17 42 98 .752
5 Josh Jung 3B · R .295 .360 .450 .810 11 39 78 .724
6 Evan Carter CF · L .195 .289 .316 .605 9 38 112 .743
7 Joc Pederson DH · L .235 .329 .487 .816 26 53 102 .720
8 Corey Seager SS · L .231 .321 .426 .747 18 47 94 .763
9 Nicky Lopez 2B · L .269 .317 .308 .625 1 24 42 .698

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

NYM starter vs Rangers lineup

Sean Manaea (LHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 657 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JP Joc Pederson LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (6% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Sean Manaea vs Rangers: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · NYM
Andy Green
Lineup 5.3 R Bunts 2.7 R IBBs 1.6 R
HOME · TEX
Skip Schumaker
Lineup 3.2 R Bunts 4.4 R IBBs 5.2 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · NYM
  • Available 6
  • Limited 3
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 0
HOME · TEX
  • Available 7
  • Limited 1
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 1

Recent form

AWAY · NYM
3-7 L1 -1 run diff
LWWLLLLLWL
HOME · TEX
6-4 L1 +6 run diff
LWWLWWWWLL

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Mets and Rangers staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.