PREVIEW Starts 9:40 PM ET · Sutter Health Park
September 22, 2026 · AL West

Los Angeles Angels at Oakland Athletics

September 22, 20269:40 PM ETSutter Health Park
AWAY
Los Angeles Angels
60-96
@
HOME
Oakland Athletics
61-95

Probable starters

AWAY · LAA
HOME · ATH

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Hitter season stats

Season-to-date lines for each hitter in the projected lineup, with a Marcel projection (Proj OPS). Season columns are 2026 to date; Proj is a forward-looking estimate, not a result.

AWAY · LAA Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Zach Neto SS · R .237 .323 .433 .756 26 74 209 .750
2 Mike Trout CF · R .241 .381 .419 .800 21 53 159 .728
3 Vaughn Grissom 1B · R .237 .304 .383 .687 12 66 83 .727
4 Oswald Peraza 2B · R .226 .283 .336 .619 7 25 108 .708
5 Moisés Ballesteros DH · L .220 .283 .343 .626 9 35 76 .753
6 Josh Lowe LF · L .209 .273 .364 .637 12 29 98 .723
7 Wade Meckler LF · L .289 .365 .372 .737 3 27 60 .730
8 Denzer Guzman 3B · R .225 .270 .340 .610 7 29 72 .748
9 Jose Siri LF · R .234 .289 .407 .696 9 30 78 .704
HOME · ATH Projected · top 9 by AB
BATTER 2026 SEASON PROJ OPS
AVGOBPSLGOPSHRRBIK
1 Jeff McNeil 2B · L .266 .313 .367 .680 8 54 56 .709
2 Lawrence Butler RF · L .228 .321 .385 .706 17 59 135 .736
3 Shea Langeliers C · R .263 .329 .483 .812 23 55 102 .740
4 Henry Bolte CF · R .272 .357 .396 .753 11 35 126 .746
5 Zack Gelof 3B · R .252 .314 .456 .770 19 50 102 .722
6 Jonah Heim C · S .204 .260 .370 .630 13 42 69 .695
7 Carlos Cortes RF · L .252 .320 .389 .709 9 40 60 .725
8 Max Muncy 3B · R .230 .296 .387 .683 9 30 91 .736
9 Donovan Walton 2B · L .269 .365 .454 .819 8 29 42 .711

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

LAA starter vs Athletics lineup

Yusei Kikuchi (LHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (3% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Yusei Kikuchi vs Athletics: full season matchup breakdown →
ATH starter vs Angels lineup

Brady Basso (LHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Brady Basso vs Angels: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · LAA
Kurt Suzuki
Lineup 3.0 R Bunts 4.5 R IBBs 5.5 R
HOME · ATH
Mark Kotsay
Lineup 4.3 R Bunts 2.2 R IBBs 3.3 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · LAA
  • Available 7
  • Limited 1
  • Rest required 1
  • Inactive 0
HOME · ATH
  • Available 9
  • Limited 2
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 0

Recent form

AWAY · LAA
4-6 L1 -14 run diff
LWLWLWWLLL
HOME · ATH
3-7 L6 -34 run diff
LLLLLLWLWW

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Angels and Athletics staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.