PREVIEW Starts 6:40 PM ET · loanDepot park
June 23, 2026 · NL East

Texas Rangers at Miami Marlins

June 23, 20266:40 PM ETloanDepot park
AWAY
Texas Rangers
38-40
—
@
HOME
Miami Marlins
40-39
—

Probable starters

AWAY · TEX
Cal Quantrill
Cal Quantrill
HOME · MIA
Sandy Alcantara
Sandy Alcantara

Lineups

Lineups are usually announced ~90 minutes before first pitch. Check back soon.

Pitcher vs. lineup projection

Projected expected wOBA for each probable starter against the opposing lineup, by batting order. A season-to-date matchup read — forward-looking, not a result.

TEX starter vs Marlins lineup

Cal Quantrill (RHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 XE Xavier Edwards SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Xavier Edwards
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CN Connor Norby RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JM Joe Mack LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Cal Quantrill vs Marlins: full season matchup breakdown →
MIA starter vs Rangers lineup

Sandy Alcantara (RHP)

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JJ Josh Jung RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Burger RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Justin Foscue RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Foscue
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sandy Alcantara vs Rangers: full season matchup breakdown →

Manager comparison

AWAY · TEX
Skip Schumaker
Skip Schumaker
Lineup 1.9 R Bunts 0.8 R IBBs 1.4 R
HOME · MIA
Clayton McCullough
Clayton McCullough
Lineup 2.4 R Bunts 1.2 R IBBs 0.8 R

Bullpen availability

AWAY · TEX
  • Available 5
  • Limited 3
  • Rest required 0
  • Inactive 1
HOME · MIA
  • Available 7
  • Limited 2
  • Rest required 1
  • Inactive 1

Recent form

AWAY · TEX
4-6 W2 -26 run diff
WWLWLLLWLL
HOME · MIA
6-4 L1 +5 run diff
LWWWWLLWLW

Season series: 1-0 with TEX listed first across 1 prior meeting.

Pitching & bullpen preview

Probable starters and each bullpen's availability load in the sections above — the Rangers and Marlins staffs going in.

Once the game ends, a full pitching and bullpen breakdown appears here: starter lines, the relief sequence and each arm's role, pitch counts, and where the game turned.

Keep reading

How RunsLeft analyzes games

Standard content on this page comes from the MLB Stats API. The pitching analysis describes how the game was pitched — the starter's line, the bullpen sequence and each arm's role (opener, bulk, setup, closer), pitch counts as a fatigue signal, and the leverage context where the game turned. Reliever roles are inferred from how the manager used each arm up to that date. It describes structure and constraints; it does not grade the manager.

Read the full methodology.

← All matchups