RunsLeft › Pitchers › Cal Quantrill
Pitcher · Texas Rangers

Cal Quantrill

RHP · Throws Right · Age 31Swingman
Model projection · strikeout prop
59.7%
59.7% against a 57.7% break-even. Over 3.5 Ks, tonight vs. LAA. Confidence medium.
ERA
3.13
FIP
–
IP
77.2
W-L
5-4
WHIP
1.15
K%
16.7
BB%
6.8
GB%
–
K/9
6.3
HR/9
1.0
Drafted by the San Diego Padres in 2016 (round 1), he was signed by the Texas Rangers in free agency in February 2026. He made his MLB debut on May 1, 2019.Facts: MLB StatsAPI (people · transactions)

Tonight's Matchup

vs. Angels · pregame

Projected xwOBA vs. Angels current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) — season profile, not tonight's posted lineup · lineup avg .311

  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JL Josh Lowe LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jose Siri RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Tyler Heineman SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Heineman
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
▸ Full season matchup breakdown → · game preview

Sinker

SI · lead pitch

24% of pitches · .339 xwOBA allowed · 330 BIP · where it goes, what it costs

Pitcher Locations
where he throws it · catcher’s view
3%3%2%1%0%7%8%6%2%1%11%17%14%6%2%2%3%2%2%1%1%2%3%1%1%
Rare 0% · Common 10% · Very common 20%+
xwOBA Allowed
damage done by zone · all batters
.256.213.281.000–.318.402.293.103–.264.404.297.156.649.778.281.357.238–.796.472.614.568.703
Cold .200 · Avg .310 · Hot .500+
Expected Damage
locations × damage zones
.008.007.005.000–.022.034.018.002–.029.069.041.010.014.012.007.008.005–.008.011.016.008.006
Low risk · Average · High-risk zone
Sinker (24% usage) has allowed .339 xwOBA over 330 balls in play — his most-used pitch.

Arsenal

usage × whiff, ranked

7 pitch types · 5,640-pitch sample · 2026/2025/2024 blend, weighted 4/3/1

Sinker SI
24% usage · 13% whiff · .339 xwOBA · 94.1 mph
Splitter FS
23% usage · 21% whiff · .302 xwOBA · 85.3 mph
Cutter FC
21% usage · 16% whiff · .398 xwOBA · 88.5 mph
Four-Seam Fastball FF
17% usage · 19% whiff · .343 xwOBA · 94.0 mph
Curveball CU
9% usage · 22% whiff · .328 xwOBA · 79.1 mph
Slider SL
4% usage · 16% whiff · .514 xwOBA
Changeup CH
1% usage · 19% whiff · .394 xwOBA
Whiff% Trend
last 8 outings · by pitch · min 5 swings per point
0102030405060706/236/277/47/107/177/228/88/18
SinkerSplitterCutter
Hand Splits
K% + xwOBA allowed by batter side · 2026/2025/2024 blend, weighted 4/3/1
SplitK%xwOBASample
vs. LHB18.8 .360 689
vs. RHB13.3 .341 719
Live · client-hydrated

Market lines

current pick’em lines by book · updates through the day

Live lines load in your browser.
Live · client-hydrated

DFS picks

today’s picks for this pitcher, probability-sorted · graded nightly

Today’s picks load in your browser.