PITCHER MATCHUP

Trevor Rogers vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trevor Rogers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trevor Rogers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .268vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Changeup 23%Sinker 14%Cutter 13%Sweeper 9%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trevor Rogers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 467 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.