PITCHER MATCHUP

Trevor Rogers vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trevor Rogers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trevor Rogers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .255vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 22%Sinker 14%Cutter 11%Sweeper 10%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trevor Rogers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.