PITCHER MATCHUP

Trevor Rogers vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trevor Rogers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trevor Rogers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .268vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Changeup 23%Sinker 14%Cutter 13%Sweeper 9%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trevor Rogers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JS Jorge Soler RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-05 game page →