PITCHER MATCHUP

Trevor Rogers vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Trevor Rogers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Trevor Rogers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .255vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 22%Sinker 14%Cutter 11%Sweeper 10%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Trevor Rogers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.