PITCHER MATCHUP

Tomoyuki Sugano vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tomoyuki Sugano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tomoyuki Sugano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .403vs RHH xwOBA .347Seasons 2026–2025
Splitter 22%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Sinker 17%Sweeper 15%Cutter 12%Curveball 8%Slider 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tomoyuki Sugano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .414 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 626 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 565 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 EH Eric Haase RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eric Haase
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-04 game page →