PITCHER MATCHUP

Tomoyuki Sugano vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Tomoyuki Sugano's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Tomoyuki Sugano's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .397vs RHH xwOBA .350Seasons 2026–2025
Splitter 22%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Sinker 17%Sweeper 15%Cutter 12%Curveball 8%Slider 6%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Tomoyuki Sugano, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 599 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .236 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-11 game page →