PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Drohan vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Drohan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Drohan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .280vs RHH xwOBA .269Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 19%Sinker 19%Cutter 14%Curveball 12%Changeup 6%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Drohan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 545 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 AM Angel Martínez SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-18 game page →