PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Drohan vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Drohan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Drohan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .272vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Slider 21%Sinker 20%Curveball 13%Cutter 12%Changeup 6%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Drohan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.