PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Drohan vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Drohan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Drohan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .276vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 20%Sinker 19%Curveball 14%Cutter 11%Changeup 5%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Drohan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 574 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 644 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DS Daniel Susac RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Susac
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-29 game page →