PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Drohan vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Drohan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Drohan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .294Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 20%Sinker 19%Curveball 14%Cutter 12%Changeup 5%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Drohan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 475 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-13 game page →