PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Drohan vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Drohan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Drohan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .276vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 31%Slider 20%Sinker 19%Curveball 14%Cutter 11%Changeup 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Drohan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 516 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (20% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-31 game page →