PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Drohan vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Drohan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Drohan's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .277vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Slider 21%Sinker 21%Curveball 13%Cutter 12%Changeup 5%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Drohan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.