PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Baz vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Baz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Baz's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Knuckle Curve 29%Cutter 15%Changeup 10%Slider 3%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Baz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TH Tyler Heineman SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Heineman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-23 game page →