PITCHER MATCHUP

Shane Baz vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Shane Baz's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Shane Baz's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 39%Knuckle Curve 30%Cutter 14%Changeup 10%Sinker 5%Slider 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Shane Baz, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (39% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (30% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.