PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Newcomb vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Newcomb's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Newcomb's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .303vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 35%SV 27%Sinker 21%Cutter 7%Curveball 5%Changeup 5%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Newcomb, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (27% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.