PITCHER MATCHUP

Sean Manaea vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Sean Manaea's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Sean Manaea's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .293vs RHH xwOBA .334Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Sweeper 29%Sinker 16%Cutter 7%Changeup 6%Slider 1%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Sean Manaea, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 337 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.