PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .272Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 32%Curveball 13%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .407 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.