PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 31%Curveball 14%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 559 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-02 game page →