PITCHER MATCHUP
Reid Detmers vs Minnesota Twins
How the Minnesota Twins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.
Reid Detmers's arsenal
Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 32%Curveball 13%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%
How the Minnesota Twins's regulars project
Projected expected wOBA for each of the Minnesota Twins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.
Lineup avg xwOBA .309
-
1 BL Brooks Lee SH .280
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brooks Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
2 JB Josh Bell SH .327
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Bell
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 KC Kody Clemens SH .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kody Clemens
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
-
4 LK Luke Keaschall RHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luke Keaschall
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 RL Royce Lewis RHB .301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Royce Lewis
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
6 TL Trevor Larnach LHB .316
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Larnach
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
7 VC Victor Caratini SH .318
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Caratini
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 AM Austin Martin RHB .310
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Martin
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
9 RJ Ryan Jeffers RHB .319
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Jeffers
- Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-19 game page →