PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .318vs RHH xwOBA .277Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 31%Curveball 14%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .307
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 618 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .279
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .273
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 ED Elias Díaz RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elias Díaz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-21 game page →