PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .279Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Curveball 14%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%Unknown 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 573 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JJ Josh Jung RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Burger RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Josh Smith LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-09 game page →