PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .312vs RHH xwOBA .272Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 32%Curveball 13%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (32% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.