PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .274Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 30%Curveball 14%Changeup 8%Sinker 3%Unknown 1%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .374
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 545 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 492 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Jorge Barrosa SH .271
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Barrosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (3% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-16 game page →