PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Slider 31%Curveball 14%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .368
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 539 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.