PITCHER MATCHUP

Reid Detmers vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Reid Detmers's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Reid Detmers's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .271Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 30%Curveball 14%Changeup 8%Sinker 2%Unknown 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Reid Detmers, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MM Max Muncy RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-21 game page →