PITCHER MATCHUP

Nolan McLean vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nolan McLean's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nolan McLean's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .314vs RHH xwOBA .259Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 34%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 14%Sweeper 14%Cutter 10%Changeup 7%Slider 2%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nolan McLean, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sinker (34% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.