PITCHER MATCHUP

Nolan McLean vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nolan McLean's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nolan McLean's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .302vs RHH xwOBA .270Seasons 2026–2025
Sinker 32%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Sweeper 18%Curveball 14%Cutter 10%Changeup 7%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nolan McLean, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Sinker (32% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →