PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Changeup 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 8%Slider 7%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.