PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Changeup 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 8%Slider 7%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .432 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.