PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .311vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Changeup 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 8%Slider 7%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .327
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WS Will Smith RHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 373 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.