PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .316Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Changeup 23%Sinker 22%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 9%Slider 7%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.