PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Changeup 23%Sinker 21%Cutter 20%Four-Seam Fastball 18%Curveball 10%Slider 8%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 519 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (18% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.