PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Changeup 23%Sinker 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 9%Slider 7%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 599 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 554 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (23% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.