PITCHER MATCHUP

Nick Martinez vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nick Martinez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nick Martinez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .309vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 24%Changeup 23%Cutter 21%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Curveball 8%Slider 7%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nick Martinez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 648 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 603 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 534 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 344 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (21% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.