PITCHER MATCHUP

Nathan Eovaldi vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nathan Eovaldi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nathan Eovaldi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Splitter 34%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Curveball 20%Cutter 19%Sinker 6%Slider 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nathan Eovaldi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 645 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 405 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 387 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 LT Lane Thomas RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lane Thomas
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.