PITCHER MATCHUP

Nathan Eovaldi vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nathan Eovaldi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nathan Eovaldi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Splitter 34%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Curveball 20%Cutter 19%Sinker 6%Slider 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nathan Eovaldi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GS George Springer RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Jesús Sánchez LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jesús Sánchez
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MS Myles Straw RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.