PITCHER MATCHUP

Nathan Eovaldi vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nathan Eovaldi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nathan Eovaldi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .315vs RHH xwOBA .291Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Splitter 34%Four-Seam Fastball 20%Curveball 20%Cutter 19%Sinker 5%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nathan Eovaldi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 535 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JL Josh Lowe LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (20% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.