PITCHER MATCHUP

Nathan Eovaldi vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nathan Eovaldi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nathan Eovaldi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .276Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Splitter 33%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Curveball 19%Cutter 19%Sinker 6%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nathan Eovaldi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JS Jorge Soler RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Splitter (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-09 game page →