PITCHER MATCHUP

Nathan Eovaldi vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Nathan Eovaldi's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Nathan Eovaldi's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .313vs RHH xwOBA .287Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Splitter 34%Four-Seam Fastball 21%Curveball 20%Cutter 19%Sinker 6%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Nathan Eovaldi, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Splitter (34% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (21% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.