PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 41%SV 22%Slider 15%Sinker 9%Changeup 7%Curveball 5%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .325
  1. 1 JW James Wood LHB .376
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 DL Daylen Lile LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CA CJ Abrams LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JY Jacob Young RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CM Curtis Mead RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Curtis Mead
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DC Dylan Crews RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-25 game page →