PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.