PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .408 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.