70.8% against a 57.7% break-even. Over 3.5 Ks, tonight vs. CIN. Confidence high.
ERA
4.17
FIP
–
IP
36.2
W-L
1-2
WHIP
1.47
K%
15.7
BB%
13.8
GB%
–
K/9
6.1
HR/9
1.2
Drafted by the Texas Rangers in 2021 (round 5), he was acquired by the Arizona Diamondbacks via trade from the Texas Rangers in July 2025. He made his MLB debut on June 24, 2026.Facts: MLB StatsAPI (people · transactions)
Tonight's Matchup
vs. Reds · pregame
Projected xwOBA vs. Reds current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) — season profile, not tonight's posted lineup · lineup avg .320
1SSSal StewartRHB.349
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
SV (22% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Slider (11% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
2EDElly De La CruzSH.324
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 589 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
SV (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Slider (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
3JBJJ BledayLHB.323
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
SV (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Slider (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
4ESEugenio SuárezRHB.313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 522 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SV (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Slider (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
5MMMatt McLainRHB.320
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SV (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Slider (11% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
6TSTyler StephensonRHB.336
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
SV (22% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Slider (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
7TFTJ FriedlLHB.301
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 454 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SV (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Slider (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
8DMDane MyersRHB.317
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SV (22% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Slider (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
9KHKe'Bryan HayesRHB.298
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
SV (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
Slider (11% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Changeup (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Sinker (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Curveball (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.