PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 505 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 650 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AM Angel Martínez SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.