PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 41%SV 22%Slider 15%Sinker 9%Changeup 7%Curveball 5%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 SK Steven Kwan LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Slider (15% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-31 game page →