PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 614 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.