PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .371
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .202 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .223 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JC Jonah Cox RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.