PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .337
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .401 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.