PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 500 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 HB Henry Bolte RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JH Jonah Heim SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 479 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MM Max Muncy RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Alika Williams RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alika Williams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.