PITCHER MATCHUP

Mitch Bratt vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Mitch Bratt's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Mitch Bratt's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .279vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 48%SV 22%Changeup 10%Slider 9%Sinker 8%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Mitch Bratt, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 227 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jonah Heim SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • SV (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DW Donovan Walton LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (48% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.