PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Henderson vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Henderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Henderson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .243Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 46%Changeup 37%Cutter 14%Slider 2%Sweeper 2%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Henderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 665 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .372
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (46% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (37% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.