PITCHER MATCHUP

Logan Henderson vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Logan Henderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Logan Henderson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .290vs RHH xwOBA .232Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 45%Changeup 36%Cutter 16%Slider 3%Sweeper 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Logan Henderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 630 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 EC Evan Carter LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .374
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (45% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (36% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-28 game page →