PITCHER MATCHUP

Lake Bachar vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Lake Bachar's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Lake Bachar's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .295vs RHH xwOBA .299Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Slider 23%Sweeper 20%Curveball 11%Splitter 10%Sinker 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Lake Bachar, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .404 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Jonah Cox RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .214 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over limited BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.