PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Leahy vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Leahy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Leahy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .359vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Slider 18%Curveball 16%Sweeper 14%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Leahy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .319
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TT Tim Tawa RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JF Jose Fernandez RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Fernandez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.