PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Leahy vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Leahy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Leahy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .361vs RHH xwOBA .318Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Slider 18%Curveball 16%Sweeper 14%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Leahy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 KM Ketel Marte SH .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 595 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 AD Adrian Del Castillo LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adrian Del Castillo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TT Tim Tawa RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.