PITCHER MATCHUP

Kyle Leahy vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kyle Leahy's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kyle Leahy's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .363vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 19%Curveball 16%Sweeper 13%Changeup 11%Sinker 10%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kyle Leahy, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 423 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JL Josh Lowe LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (19% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (16% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-20 game page →