PITCHER MATCHUP

Kade Morris vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Kade Morris's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Kade Morris's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .400vs RHH xwOBA .248Seasons 2026
Sinker 36%Four-Seam Fastball 19%Slider 16%Changeup 12%Sweeper 11%Curveball 6%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Kade Morris, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .333
  1. 1 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 CY Cole Young LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JN Josh Naylor LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 514 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TW Taylor Ward RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .406 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CR Cal Raleigh SH .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .436 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 617 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 WW Weston Wilson RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Weston Wilson
    • Sinker (36% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.