PITCHER MATCHUP

Janson Junk vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Janson Junk's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Janson Junk's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 35%Slider 24%Sweeper 14%Changeup 14%Curveball 10%Sinker 2%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Janson Junk, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 635 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .230 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (24% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (14% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (2% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-15 game page →