PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .221vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Changeup 26%Sinker 25%Sweeper 8%Cutter 4%Curveball 3%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .222 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .239 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 437 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .213 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.