PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .242vs RHH xwOBA .285Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Sinker 27%Changeup 25%Sweeper 6%Curveball 4%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .350
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .223 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC José Caballero RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 339 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 438 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .215 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.