PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .233vs RHH xwOBA .273Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sinker 28%Changeup 26%Curveball 6%Sweeper 5%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DR Drew Romo SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Romo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-08 game page →