PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .231vs RHH xwOBA .314Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Changeup 26%Sinker 25%Sweeper 7%Cutter 4%Curveball 3%Unknown 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 652 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 269 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 451 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JJ Josh Jung RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CS Corey Seager LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .277
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (26% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-16 game page →