PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .236vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sinker 27%Changeup 25%Sweeper 6%Curveball 5%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 466 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-02 game page →