PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .228vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Changeup 27%Sinker 24%Sweeper 8%Cutter 4%Curveball 3%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .326
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 643 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 335 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AP Andy Pages RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 TE Tommy Edman SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 WS Will Smith RHB .353
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Will Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AF Alex Freeland SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (27% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (3% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.