PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Toronto Blue Jays

How the Toronto Blue Jays's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .236vs RHH xwOBA .290Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sinker 27%Changeup 25%Sweeper 6%Curveball 5%Cutter 4%Unknown 1%

How the Toronto Blue Jays's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Toronto Blue Jays's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 EC Ernie Clement SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ernie Clement
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KO Kazuma Okamoto RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kazuma Okamoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 VG Vladimir Guerrero Jr. RHB .361
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vladimir Guerrero Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 DV Daulton Varsho LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daulton Varsho
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AG Andrés Giménez LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrés Giménez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 GS George Springer RHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. George Springer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 NL Nathan Lukes LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathan Lukes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BV Brandon Valenzuela SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Valenzuela
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MS Myles Straw RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Myles Straw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (27% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.