PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .256vs RHH xwOBA .281Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sinker 26%Changeup 25%Sweeper 7%Cutter 4%Curveball 4%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .304
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .218 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 529 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 WM Wade Meckler LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (26% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.