PITCHER MATCHUP

Jake Bennett vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Jake Bennett's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Jake Bennett's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .235vs RHH xwOBA .262Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sinker 28%Changeup 25%Curveball 6%Sweeper 5%Cutter 3%Unknown 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Jake Bennett, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .302
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 436 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .221 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (6% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-03 game page →