PITCHER MATCHUP

Griffin Canning vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Griffin Canning's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Griffin Canning's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .350vs RHH xwOBA .315Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 32%Slider 26%Changeup 24%Knuckle Curve 8%Sinker 4%Cutter 4%Sweeper 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Griffin Canning, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 478 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 584 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 480 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TE Tommy Edman SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (32% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (4% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.