PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 22%Curveball 22%Sinker 11%Cutter 11%Slider 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 412 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 EQ Edgar Quero SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.