PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .330Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Curveball 22%Sweeper 21%Cutter 12%Sinker 10%Slider 1%Changeup 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .420 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 EQ Edgar Quero SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-22 game page →