PITCHER MATCHUP

Gavin Williams vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Gavin Williams's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Gavin Williams's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sweeper 23%Curveball 22%Sinker 11%Cutter 10%Slider 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Gavin Williams, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 497 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .419 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.